As part of our relationship with a UK business partner, Flynet Limited, we originally used the term “Flynet” to brand the product line. Inventu developed the product line, and owns the relevant software copyrights. Our relationship with Flynet Limited ended in 2018 and, to clarify and streamline our offerings, we will now offer the product line only under the “Inventu” brand. We will support all products offered under our Inventu brand name and we will support all of our customers’ products currently installed under the “Flynet” brand name.
Since the first release of Screensurfer, Inventu’s original web-based emulation software in 1995, our commitment has always been the same — to provide exceptional responsiveness to the daily and evolving needs of our customers, present and future. Nothing has changed.
We are proud of our products and our support and would be happy to answer any questions you may have about the name change or any other aspects of our software!
The Flynet Viewer server and components created in 2018 are getting old and stale, especially when compared to the latest versions available from Inventu. Any prospective customers that search for "Flynet Viewer" immediately find many pages on the Inventu site including comparisons that make the Flynet version look primitive.
With Flynet Viewer a deadend for Flynet LTD, in March of 2024 the Flynet LTD website has switched and Flynet itself has changed the name of their products from Flynet Viewer to "Jubilant" including "Jubilant TE" and "Jubilant Studio". Even 3rd party sites with "reviews" have had the names changed to "Jubilant" even though the reviews were for Flynet Viewer 2016!
Tests as of July 2025 show it to be a somewhat crude-looking terminal emulation user interface with cramped, sub-optimal fonts and and odd colors when compared to traditional terminal emulators. There are some well-done configuration options for the keyboard but the 5250 and 3270 keyboard defaults cover a minimal set of keys. Interesting "macro" toolset with step-by-step creation of automated workflows (no recorder). Compared to Inventu Viewer (or older Flynet Viewer), there is sluggish and buggy performance. Hardly usable as a replacement for even the 7 year old Flynet Viewer 2016--only 3270 and 5250 protocols are supported and performance will have users wondering what changed?
>>>> Click Here to See how it compares to the latest Inventu Viewer+ <<<< .